CASE REPORT

Revision MIS TLIF for Persistent Sciatica After Two Previous Open Spine Surgeries

Revision MIS TLIF for Persistent Sciatica After Two Previous Open Spine Surgeries

Revision minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) for severe right-sided L4–L5 foraminal stenosis with recurrent disc herniation following two previous lumbar laminectomies.

Revision Case

Two previous open lumbar spine surgeries

L4–L5

Right-sided foraminal stenosis with disc herniation

MIS TLIF

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed

Pain Relief

Complete resolution of leg pain following surgery

Clinical history

The patient presented with persistent lower back pain and severe right-sided sciatica despite having undergone two previous open lumbar spine surgeries (laminectomies). Although the earlier procedures had provided temporary relief, the symptoms gradually returned and continued to interfere with walking and routine daily activities.

Because the pain persisted after multiple operations, a detailed reassessment was undertaken to identify the underlying cause before planning further treatment.

Outcome

The patient’s right-sided leg pain resolved completely following surgery. Lower back symptoms improved significantly, and the patient is now walking comfortably without the severe sciatica that had persisted despite two previous operations. Daily activities have been resumed with a marked improvement in overall quality of life.

Cause and clinical significance

Persistent or recurrent symptoms after lumbar spine surgery may occur when nerve compression develops again because of recurrent disc herniation, progressive foraminal narrowing, spinal instability, or degenerative changes at the operated level. In revision cases, scar tissue from previous procedures can make surgery more complex, requiring careful planning and meticulous surgical technique.

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) combines thorough nerve decompression with stabilization of the affected spinal segment through a smaller surgical approach. In appropriately selected patients, this technique can provide effective relief from persistent nerve compression while limiting muscle injury and supporting a smoother recovery compared with conventional revision open surgery.

Scroll to Top